Book Review: Counted Righteous in Christ
Aug 20th, 2008 by Nathan White

| Counted Righteous in Christ John Piper Should we abandon the imputation of Christ’s righteousness? |
I picked this book up because of my recent exposure to those who deny the imputation of Christ’s “active” obedience on behalf of believers. Some proponents of New Covenant Theology and Dispensationalism have headed in the direction of denying the historically-protestant doctrine of imputation, not to mention the classical objections from Rome and semi-pelagians, but Piper certainly meets their objections head-on.
The book is a short 125 pages, but don’t let that fool you, for the main thrust of his argument (the third chapter) is loaded with solid and meticulous exegesis. In short, Piper interacts with a treatise by Robert Gundry, and does so in the humble, pastoral way we’ve come accustomed to with Piper.
The book can really be broken down into four parts, as follows:
1. Evidence that the righteousness imputed to us is external and not our faith.
a. To this, Piper examines and exegetes the following texts: Rom 4:5-6 paralleled with Rom 3:28; Rom 4:9-11; 10:10; Phil 3:8-9.
2. The external righteousness credited to us is God’s
a. To this, Piper examines and exegetes the following texts: Rom 3:20 - 4:6; 2 Cor 5:21
3. Justification is not liberation from sin’s mastery [and by this Piper means perfectionism, infused righteousness, salvation by our continual effort, etc.]
a. To this, Piper examines and exegetes the following texts: Rom 6:6-7; flow of thought in Rom 8:3-4
4. The divine righteousness imputed to believers is the righteousness of Jesus Christ
a. To this, Piper examines and exegetes the following texts: 2 Cor 5:21; Phil 3:9; 1 Cor 1:30; Rom 10:4; Rom 5:12-19
Personally, I would see his exegesis of Romans 5:12-19 to be his most potent and thorough argument. This section alone is worth the price of the book.
Conclusion:
This book absolutely deserves the highest rating, five stars. Piper defends the doctrine that is at the very heart of the Christian faith, and does so in such a warm, thorough manner, that the believer who is indeed covered by Jesus Christ’s perfect righteousness will no doubt leap for joy. In the face of such shoddy theology in this land, not to mention the shallowness of the American church which probably can’t even define the term ‘active obedience’, this doctrine of imputation of Christ’s obedience by faith alone has fallen by the wayside. I would submit that many errors of pelagianism, salvation-by-merit or works, and even self-willed sanctification begin with a misunderstanding or misconstruing of this precious doctrine.
Are we counted righteous based upon God’s righteousness and not our own? Is this righteousness imputed or ‘counted’ to us by faith alone, as opposed to ‘infused’ or self-merited? Is this righteousness the perfect obedience of the second Adam, Jesus Christ, in our place? Piper proves from scripture that the answer to these questions is without a shadow of a doubt, ‘Yes’. And this, my friends, *is* the gospel. And the defense of the gospel in the face of error never gets old.
| Out of 5 stars, I give this one a strong 5. Without a doubt, this is a must-have must-read. |
Nathan,
I rarely comment on blogs I read and I don’t believe I’ve ever commented here but I wanted you to know that I read your site daily and appreciate all of you articles. I’ve learned much from you and pray our gracious Lord will bless you for your diligence in His word.
Thanks,
Denny
Denny–
But thank you for your kind words, they were a great encouragement to me.
I rarely comment on blogs either, even my own
The quotes you referenced lean heavily towards the idealization of a total and complete passive relationship with God. At the end of the Christian road is a complete obliteration of the Self as God acts through and from within the individual in a manner that renders the individual personality null, if it doesn’t destroy it completely. There will be no Heaven to enjoy because there will be no “you”. This reads somewhat like Eastern mysticism to me, to be perfectly honest: Nirvana occurs when the soul is “sucked up” into the greater universal consciousness and the individual ego and super-ego or consumed by some Great Spirit (whatever it is).
This seems a dangerous line of thought if it’s taken down the road into thinking we are “becoming as God”. I think it’s important to recall that we are distinct entities from God and always will be. I’m not sure heavenly union consists of a complete reduction of the self into nothingness so that all that remains is God. We will still be completely distinct and separate beings with unique identities. Perhaps I’m reading too much into the words here.
Yes, you are…