<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sam Waldron on John MacArthur&#8217;s &#8216;Millennium Manifesto&#8217;</title>
	<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/</link>
	<description>"Shepherd the flock of God that is among you, exercising oversight, not under compulsion, but willingly, as God would have you...”</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-905</link>
		<author>JP</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-905</guid>
					<description>Likewise check-out Pastor Waldron's book..&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/End-Times-Made-Simple-Everybody/dp/1879737507/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-3185571-1229511?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books&#38;qid=1190929420&#38;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow"&gt;The End Times Made Simple.&lt;/a&gt;

JP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Likewise check-out Pastor Waldron&#8217;s book..<a href="http://www.amazon.com/End-Times-Made-Simple-Everybody/dp/1879737507/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-3185571-1229511?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1190929420&amp;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">The End Times Made Simple.</a></p>
<p>JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan White</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-910</link>
		<author>Nathan White</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-910</guid>
					<description>JP, yes, very good book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JP, yes, very good book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirk</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-911</link>
		<author>dirk</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-911</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the links to Dr. Waldrons articles – very Helpful Nathan :-)  

I'm in a similar position (historic premill.) - I respect Dr. MacArthur for his preaching and his pastoral work all over the world (in fact I studied at the Masters Academy International), but I'm completely opposed to his dispensational view on eschatology. It's amazing for a man of his format that he could make those statements in such an uninformed way.

However - you will also find a very thoughtful response to Dr. MacArthurs opening sermon on Kim Riddlebargers Blog:

http://kimriddlebarger.squarespace.com/a-reply-to-john-macarthur/ 

- and also a very good discussion of the subject in the archive of the 'Narrow Mind' Radio Show - You will find it in two parts (mp3 files) on the related blog (Archives March 2007): 

http://tnma.blogspot.com/2007_03_01_archive.html

- there you find it under the heading: "Why Every Self Respecting Calvinist Should Know the Difference Between Israel after the Flesh and The Israel after the Promise"

Your servant,

dirk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links to Dr. Waldrons articles – very Helpful Nathan <img src='http://shepherdtheflock.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m in a similar position (historic premill.) - I respect Dr. MacArthur for his preaching and his pastoral work all over the world (in fact I studied at the Masters Academy International), but I&#8217;m completely opposed to his dispensational view on eschatology. It&#8217;s amazing for a man of his format that he could make those statements in such an uninformed way.</p>
<p>However - you will also find a very thoughtful response to Dr. MacArthurs opening sermon on Kim Riddlebargers Blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://kimriddlebarger.squarespace.com/a-reply-to-john-macarthur/" rel="nofollow">http://kimriddlebarger.squarespace.com/a-reply-to-john-macarthur/</a> </p>
<p>- and also a very good discussion of the subject in the archive of the &#8216;Narrow Mind&#8217; Radio Show - You will find it in two parts (mp3 files) on the related blog (Archives March 2007): </p>
<p><a href="http://tnma.blogspot.com/2007_03_01_archive.html" rel="nofollow">http://tnma.blogspot.com/2007_03_01_archive.html</a></p>
<p>- there you find it under the heading: &#8220;Why Every Self Respecting Calvinist Should Know the Difference Between Israel after the Flesh and The Israel after the Promise&#8221;</p>
<p>Your servant,</p>
<p>dirk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan White</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-912</link>
		<author>Nathan White</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-912</guid>
					<description>Dirk,

Thanks for the links. I am familiar with both the Riddlebarger posts and the Narrow Mind programs, and they are very good. 

Just to be clear though, neither Waldron, Riddlebarger, or Gene Cook hold to the historic Premill position. Personally, I see that once the dispensational glasses come off, non-millennialism is the only consistent place to go, even though there are a few Godly men down through the years who disagree. 

SDG,
Nathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dirk,</p>
<p>Thanks for the links. I am familiar with both the Riddlebarger posts and the Narrow Mind programs, and they are very good. </p>
<p>Just to be clear though, neither Waldron, Riddlebarger, or Gene Cook hold to the historic Premill position. Personally, I see that once the dispensational glasses come off, non-millennialism is the only consistent place to go, even though there are a few Godly men down through the years who disagree. </p>
<p>SDG,<br />
Nathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-913</link>
		<author>Hannah</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-913</guid>
					<description>Nathan,
Have you read "Moses Or Christ?  Paul's Reply To Dispensational Error" by Charles D. Alexander?  I have been reading Sam Waldron's reply to McArthur and Mr. Alexander also points to the book of Galatians in refuting dispensationalism.  I thought it was very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,<br />
Have you read &#8220;Moses Or Christ?  Paul&#8217;s Reply To Dispensational Error&#8221; by Charles D. Alexander?  I have been reading Sam Waldron&#8217;s reply to McArthur and Mr. Alexander also points to the book of Galatians in refuting dispensationalism.  I thought it was very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan White</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-915</link>
		<author>Nathan White</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-915</guid>
					<description>Hannah, no, I haven't read those works, but thanks for the recommendation. I will pick them up. 

Personally, I'd have to say that Ephesians 2 did it for me. That and Acts chapter 15, Romans 2, and Romans 9. It's just crystal clear to me that a Jew, even in the Old Testament, was never simply an ethnic race, but were God's chosen people. This correlation can only make sense when you understand the New Testament's teaching on predestination and election. 

But there was a process for anyone in the Old Testament to become a 'Jew'. And this was by circumcision. All one had to do, to be a part of the promises and the Covenant people, was be circumcised and agree to follow the commandments. So, when dispensationals today teach that the Jewish race is in itself what God blessed and promised things to, it simply shows (in my opinion) a misguided understanding on the Old Testament at a very foundational level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hannah, no, I haven&#8217;t read those works, but thanks for the recommendation. I will pick them up. </p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d have to say that Ephesians 2 did it for me. That and Acts chapter 15, Romans 2, and Romans 9. It&#8217;s just crystal clear to me that a Jew, even in the Old Testament, was never simply an ethnic race, but were God&#8217;s chosen people. This correlation can only make sense when you understand the New Testament&#8217;s teaching on predestination and election. </p>
<p>But there was a process for anyone in the Old Testament to become a &#8216;Jew&#8217;. And this was by circumcision. All one had to do, to be a part of the promises and the Covenant people, was be circumcised and agree to follow the commandments. So, when dispensationals today teach that the Jewish race is in itself what God blessed and promised things to, it simply shows (in my opinion) a misguided understanding on the Old Testament at a very foundational level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eden</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-2355</link>
		<author>Eden</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-2355</guid>
					<description>I have come to this discussion late and grieve that the links for Chapters 4 to the end no longer work. Are these posts still available somewhere?

Also, in the past year has Dr. MacArthur altered his stance on this question?

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have come to this discussion late and grieve that the links for Chapters 4 to the end no longer work. Are these posts still available somewhere?</p>
<p>Also, in the past year has Dr. MacArthur altered his stance on this question?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan White</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-2362</link>
		<author>Nathan White</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-2362</guid>
					<description>Hey Eden,

I believe the posts were taken down --though I'm not sure why. I actually saved all of the posts linked to in this post, but I did not save the comments to them. Email me offline at nathan at shepherdtheflock.com, and I'll try to help you get caught up. 

And as far as I know, MacArthur has not altered his position. It will be interesting to see if he responds to Waldron's book, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Eden,</p>
<p>I believe the posts were taken down &#8211;though I&#8217;m not sure why. I actually saved all of the posts linked to in this post, but I did not save the comments to them. Email me offline at nathan at shepherdtheflock.com, and I&#8217;ll try to help you get caught up. </p>
<p>And as far as I know, MacArthur has not altered his position. It will be interesting to see if he responds to Waldron&#8217;s book, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eden</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-2363</link>
		<author>Eden</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/09/26/sam-waldon-on-john-macarthurs-millennium-manifesto/#comment-2363</guid>
					<description>Thanks, Nathan! (Check your inbox.   (^8 )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Nathan! (Check your inbox.   (^8 )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
