<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Controls Church Organization?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/</link>
	<description>"Shepherd the flock of God that is among you, exercising oversight, not under compulsion, but willingly, as God would have you...”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:19:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 16:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/#comment-220</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan et al,</p>
<p>I came across this verse recently in my daily devotions, seems pretty relevant to this discussion.</p>
<p>Joshua 8:35 “35 There was not a word of all that Moses had commanded which Joshua did not read before all the assembly of Israel, with the women, the little ones, and the strangers who were living among them.”</p>
<p>Seems that there was no segregation in the old Israel! In general I think where the church is gathered it should be all the church and their children. This does not preclude other childrens meetings at other times/evenings etc. In our circles we call such united meetings &#8220;The Gathered Church&#8221; and that included all.</p>
<p>JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordan</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 12:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Davide,

I&#039;ll give you most of that. There are elders who are more used of God in teaching and preaching, and there are those who are frankly better at than others, due to the gifting of God.

However, I still don&#039;t think this warrants differing labels, dividing one elder from another and seemingly setting up different classes of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davide,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give you most of that. There are elders who are more used of God in teaching and preaching, and there are those who are frankly better at than others, due to the gifting of God.</p>
<p>However, I still don&#8217;t think this warrants differing labels, dividing one elder from another and seemingly setting up different classes of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davide</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Davide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 17:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Nathan about the Sunday School thing. I&#039;m just not totally convinced that there is anything wrong with dividing up. 

 I am, however, against contests, games, skits, and puppet shows during Sunday School and Children&#039;s church, which, obviously have absolutely nothing to do with worship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Nathan about the Sunday School thing. I&#8217;m just not totally convinced that there is anything wrong with dividing up. </p>
<p> I am, however, against contests, games, skits, and puppet shows during Sunday School and Children&#8217;s church, which, obviously have absolutely nothing to do with worship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davide</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Davide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 17:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/#comment-189</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gordan,</p>
<p>You said: &#8220;Our Presbyterian brothers commonly divide the elders into two groups (”teaching” and “ruling”) for instance, which cannot at all be justified by the Word. An elder is an elder.&#8221; </p>
<p>I tend to differ with you on this one. Although every elder should be able to teach and lead the congregation, not all of them are going to have the job descriptions. Notice what Paul said to Timothy:</p>
<p>&#8220;Let the elders who rule well be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in preaching and teaching.&#8221;</p>
<p>This implies that some elders have a specific role of preaching while some other don&#8217;t.  I am in agreement with you, however, in the fact that Presbyterians take this way to far almost to the point of a clergy-mindset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan White</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 02:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/#comment-184</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gordan said:</strong> <em>&#8220;The churches have been feminized. I don’t see anyone debating that point.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I definitely agree with you, no question. But maybe we need to step back and examine why this is so. Personally, I see some of this as a result of the men failing to fulfill their responsibilities, and the women just doing whatever is necessary to survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordan</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 01:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Well, Nathan, you  bring up RPW and women in leadership is going to show up sooner or later. The churches have been feminized. I don&#039;t see anyone debating that point. Does RPW have anything to say about that?

I forgot about the children&#039;s church (or, &quot;Christian Education&quot;) head. That&#039;s another knotty problem, and I feel for the young pastor who has to deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Nathan, you  bring up RPW and women in leadership is going to show up sooner or later. The churches have been feminized. I don&#8217;t see anyone debating that point. Does RPW have anything to say about that?</p>
<p>I forgot about the children&#8217;s church (or, &#8220;Christian Education&#8221;) head. That&#8217;s another knotty problem, and I feel for the young pastor who has to deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan White</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 01:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>OK, I don&#039;t want to turn this into a &#039;the church is now run by women&#039; post. :) Godly women are vital to the health of a church, and they serve in many different ways. The word &#039;deacon&#039; simply means servant&#039;, and I believe it is used of Phoebe in Romans. But, Tim is right, the offical office of a deacon is for men only. 

Secondly, I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m convinced of NOT ever separating for Sunday School before the main worship service. What would be the difference in this and in something else later in the week? Is this really a part of the RP? It has nothing to do with HOW we worship God, but more on organization, it appears. I just don&#039;t know; still studying this one. 

Gordan, I have had my run-ins with the organist, the children&#039;s church head, the secretary (one secretary of the former mega-church I used to attend came on a blog one-time and ripped me to pieces), etc., so I&#039;m not stupid enough to cross them anymore :) Also, with the old people who have sat in the same seat for 50years....or when they have a pew with their name on it....trust me, stay away from them too. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I don&#8217;t want to turn this into a &#8216;the church is now run by women&#8217; post. <img src='http://shepherdtheflock.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Godly women are vital to the health of a church, and they serve in many different ways. The word &#8216;deacon&#8217; simply means servant&#8217;, and I believe it is used of Phoebe in Romans. But, Tim is right, the offical office of a deacon is for men only. </p>
<p>Secondly, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m convinced of NOT ever separating for Sunday School before the main worship service. What would be the difference in this and in something else later in the week? Is this really a part of the RP? It has nothing to do with HOW we worship God, but more on organization, it appears. I just don&#8217;t know; still studying this one. </p>
<p>Gordan, I have had my run-ins with the organist, the children&#8217;s church head, the secretary (one secretary of the former mega-church I used to attend came on a blog one-time and ripped me to pieces), etc., so I&#8217;m not stupid enough to cross them anymore <img src='http://shepherdtheflock.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Also, with the old people who have sat in the same seat for 50years&#8230;.or when they have a pew with their name on it&#8230;.trust me, stay away from them too. <img src='http://shepherdtheflock.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 00:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Would that be .............emasculation, Gordan? :) Indeed the church has become feminized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would that be &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.emasculation, Gordan? <img src='http://shepherdtheflock.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Indeed the church has become feminized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordan</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 22:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Nathan, I agree that some distinctions are clearly not biblical. Our Presbyterian brothers commonly divide the elders into two groups (&quot;teaching&quot; and &quot;ruling&quot;) for instance, which cannot at all be justified by the Word. An elder is an elder. The Westminster Confession (though I love it and it pains me to point this out) creates a priesthood, pragmatically, by inventing a new class, called a &quot;minister of word and sacrament.&quot; And they take that really seriously. No one can preach but them, or baptize, or even pronounce a benediction on the congregation.

Additionally, I&#039;ve noticed in small churches that there is a person who normally has dictatorial power over the day-to-day administration. Not an elder or deacon, no. She&#039;s the Secretary. And woe be unto the young, idealistic pastor fresh out of seminary who tries to dislodge her!! The only thing he might do that is more detremental to his own health than that, is to try and suggest changes to the church&#039;s music, by confronting the ORGANIST. The churches of God have lost many brave but foolish men in such quixotic endeavors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, I agree that some distinctions are clearly not biblical. Our Presbyterian brothers commonly divide the elders into two groups (&#8220;teaching&#8221; and &#8220;ruling&#8221;) for instance, which cannot at all be justified by the Word. An elder is an elder. The Westminster Confession (though I love it and it pains me to point this out) creates a priesthood, pragmatically, by inventing a new class, called a &#8220;minister of word and sacrament.&#8221; And they take that really seriously. No one can preach but them, or baptize, or even pronounce a benediction on the congregation.</p>
<p>Additionally, I&#8217;ve noticed in small churches that there is a person who normally has dictatorial power over the day-to-day administration. Not an elder or deacon, no. She&#8217;s the Secretary. And woe be unto the young, idealistic pastor fresh out of seminary who tries to dislodge her!! The only thing he might do that is more detremental to his own health than that, is to try and suggest changes to the church&#8217;s music, by confronting the ORGANIST. The churches of God have lost many brave but foolish men in such quixotic endeavors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davide</title>
		<link>http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>davide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 16:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shepherdtheflock.com/2007/04/30/who-controls-church-organization/#comment-175</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,<br />
You’ve made a lot of good points. Churches is being run with a capitalistic mindset. They are being run like corporations. When bigger buildings, bigger audiences, bigger orchestra, bigger choir, and a bigger youth group are the goal, then RPW simply doesn’t cut it. What they forget to realize is that biblical church growth is not found in its numbers but its holiness. God couldn’t care less about buildings, audiences, offices, etc.. The RPW is repudiated because it bring the kind of results they are looking for. But it does bring the results God is looking for:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
